Top Choice
Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View Records Sponsored partner optionWhat should you know about this search?
Direct answer
An arrest background check should verify the person, identify the arrest or booking source, follow any filed case to its disposition, and keep broader criminal-history data separate. An arrest entry alone should not be restated as a conviction or final finding.
An arrest is a record event, not a completed case result
An arrest record can show that law enforcement took action at a particular time, but it does not by itself establish a conviction or the final disposition of a criminal case. EEOC guidance makes this distinction explicit in the employment context: the fact of an arrest does not establish that criminal conduct occurred. A background search that labels an arrest as a conviction collapses separate stages of the record lifecycle and can materially misstate what happened.
Identity is a separate question. The FBI Identity History Summary process relies on fingerprints for personal review, while many public-record or people-search systems begin with names and other descriptors. A name-based hit should therefore be tied back to jurisdiction, date, case number, booking identifier, or other source details before the record is attributed to a person.
Read an arrest-related result by record stage
| Layer | What it can show | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|
| Arrest or booking record | Law-enforcement or custody event and related identifiers | That a filed charge led to conviction |
| Criminal complaint or court case | Charges, filings, hearings, and docket activity | That every allegation was sustained |
| Disposition or judgment | How the court resolved a charge or case | Current custody or every later collateral event |
| Fingerprint-linked history summary | Information associated with fingerprint submissions in the FBI system | Every state or local public record that might exist outside the summary |
Before you attach an arrest record to a person, reconcile the match
Jurisdiction
Confirm the city, county, state, or agency behind the record
A same-name record from a different place should not be merged merely because the age looks similar.
Date
Compare arrest, booking, filing, and disposition dates
The sequence helps distinguish separate incidents and prevents one case from being duplicated as several events.
Identifiers
Preserve case, booking, report, or repository numbers
Source identifiers are stronger anchors than a screenshot of an aggregate search result.
Outcome
Follow the record to the court disposition when the legal result matters
Do not infer dismissal, conviction, or sentencing from the existence of an arrest entry alone.
If the arrest result may affect employment, add the regulated-use layer
1
Confirm the underlying person and recordResolve identity and obtain the source record before treating an aggregate arrest hit as usable evidence.2
Separate arrest from convictionRead the court outcome rather than assuming the enforcement event establishes criminal conduct.3
Identify the reporting-company roleIf an employer used a third-party background company, determine which consumer report supplied the information.4
Use the applicable review processFTC guidance provides rights around permission, report access, and pre-adverse-action review when an employment consumer report is used.